Perhaps it would be wise to open #Ubuntu-LTS?

[John Vivirito]

If we open a *-LTS than it should only support
desktop. server only users should see #ubuntu
(dont recall if there is a ubuntu-server channel
or if it is for support or not.)
This maybe something that should be added to UDS
since there is going to be topics on IRC channels
anyway.

On 05/09/2010 02:43 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> On 9 May 2010 20:15, Charlie Kravetz <cjk at teamcharliesangels.com> wrote:
>> If you don't think dapper is relevant as LTS, you are using the name
>> wrong. We do actually have three LTS versions at this time, and
>> declaring it to be desktop support seems like a duplicate of #ubuntu,
>> which is also desktop support.
> 
> I didn't say Dapper wasn't relevant as an LTS. I said I didn't believe
> it would make sense to merge desktop and server for LTS just because
> they're LTS releases. If we feel the need to have a special support
> channel for LTS Server releases, then I think it should have its own
> channel, named something like #Ubuntu-Server-LTS.
> 
> Just like server issues aren't handled in #Ubuntu, though Ubuntu
> Server is also in the Ubuntu family.
> 
> Jo-Erlend Schinstad
> 

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20100510/38b1f24b/attachment.pgp>