Perhaps it would be wise to open #Ubuntu-LTS?

[Charlie Kravetz]

On Sun, 9 May 2010 19:13:23 +0200
Jo-Erlend Schinstad <joerlend.schinstad at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your verbose replies :)
> 
> I don't think Dapper is relevant. I think this channel should focus on
> the desktop only, because there is much less traffic in #ubuntu-server
> and the percentage of LTS server installations are much higher. The
> desktop also changes more when you consider that most desktop users
> will primarily use the GUI.
> 
> Jo-Erlend Schinstad
> 

If you don't think dapper is relevant as LTS, you are using the name
wrong. We do actually have three LTS versions at this time, and
declaring it to be desktop support seems like a duplicate of #ubuntu,
which is also desktop support.

-- 
Charlie Kravetz 
Linux Registered User Number 425914          [http://counter.li.org/]
Never let anyone steal your DREAM.           [http://keepingdreams.com]