#ubuntu-ops policy discussion

[Lorenzo J. Lucchini]

On Tuesday 02 February 2010 16:06:11 Juha Siltala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a side note to the discussion on the -ops policy:
>
> On 02/02/2010 03:44 PM, Joseph Price wrote:
> > When I suggested this, I wanted to emphasize that the IRCC should
> > maintain that channel, keep it a positive channel. Promote useful
> > discussions 'within friends'. I know that the ops have their private
> > channels and PMs, but I believe it would be useful for the IRCC to try
> > and keep these thoughts positive & together, behind closed doors if
> > needed.
>
> This is an idea I could easily grow to appreciate. Such a channel could
> potentially be a very good place for operators to talk shop, trade tips,
> and have lounge-area discussions. The IRCC would see that the lounge is
> tidy. The channel could also be great support for mentoring new
> operators during the probation period[1].
>
> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/IrcTeam/Probation

Wait... what? Am I misreading this, or is the idea that the ops would desert 
#ubuntu-offtopic and move their offtopic conversations to #ubuntu-ops (in a 
sanctioned way, I mean, like they don't do that already)?
I can't see how that makes sense. #ubuntu-ops is about things oplike.

by LjL
ljl at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20100202/098e9028/attachment.pgp>