Call for comments on IRCC nominees

[Lasse Havelund]

I've been watching this discussion turn more ugly by every e-mail in the
past day,
and I feel like I should--as a member of the community and an
operator--raise my
views on the final document. I hope we're out of the whole bashing phase
now,
because all it's done is stall the process so far. Let's find out if we're
even going
to settle on a charter now, or if we should wait until the new IRCC is
assembled.

As much as I can see Joseph's point in resolving the charter now, I don't
personally
see it as being so urgent. Are we scared the new IRCC will attempt to get
more
power and run the whole show themselves? I don't think so. Let's get the
actual
charter discussion going, get some feedback together and let the CC and IRCC
put together the final charter.

As for Nathan's suggested changes, I like the clarifications and additions
made
(I don't know what else to say---I fully approve).

Lasse


2009/12/17 Nathan Handler <nhandler at ubuntu.com>

> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Joseph Price <pricechild at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Great, so as a summary of the 6 points I have raised...
>
> In response to these points, I have gone ahead and prepared a diff
> against [1] to try and incorporate the suggestions Joseph made. I also
> noticed that several of the points under 'This document aims to' are
> never addressed in the document. I have some ideas concerning them,
> but I believe that more discussion is necessary before it would be
> appropriate to add anything about them to the document.
>
> Nathan
>
> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IrcTeam/IrcCouncil
>
> --
> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20091217/979cec8f/attachment.html>