Attack at the council

[John Vivirito]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Yes, though I'm not suggesting the role of the non-ops council replace that of the IRC council. I'm suggesting a means of resolution from an apparent and evident unbiased third party. A means by which to bridge the polarisation that is inevitable from the two tier system that is in place. Trust shouldn't equate to ops and I think that's a big part of the problem. That feeds the idea that ops are right and users are wrong, full stop. Also, issues often need diverting and cooling at the point incident to prevent escalation. A place to air grievances and be given a hearing from peers may lend to sorting out problems rapidly and with a perceived level of fairness from both sides. It may not, I'm suggesting it's worth a try though.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> anto9us 

Thats where the CC gets involved they are unbiased and they handle these
debates thats what theya re there for.
- --
GnomeFreak

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
https://launchpad.net/people/gnomefreak
http://freewebs.com/ubuntufreak
Linux User# 414246
Ubuntu User# 8175

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFhvAOqig4QTwcPCoRAtYhAJ94Xo+1BgUvK1S1pgeBljkb0exLmQCeK1jn
++4XIpXxKzNeV7lrmyz+G6k=
=x+4a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----