[ubuntu-in] Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat Won't Run On Processors Below i686
Anil Vishnoi
vishnoianil at gmail.com
Fri Jun 11 19:18:12 BST 2010
Ravi Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:51 PM, K Ramnarayan <ramnarayan.k at gmail.com
> <mailto:ramnarayan.k at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> See article below,
>
> Start Article
>
> Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat Won't Run On Processors Below i686
> http://www.webupd8.org/2010/06/ubuntu-1010-maverick-meerkat-wont-run.html
> If you're planning on using Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat on a
> computer with a
> processor older than i686, well... you can't.
>
> Ubuntu 10.10 will be dropping support for i386-i586 processors so
> it can take
> advantage of the i686 optimizations.
>
>
> But there seem to be some issues with this: even some new
> processors which are
> especially designed for low power consumption are i586. Such a
> processor is
> the Geode LX800 - a pretty new processor for which a bug has been
> filled on
> Launchpad but which most probably won't be fixed since Geode LX800
> is a i586
> processor.
>
>
> Thanks to Manish for the heads up!
>
> end article
> ***
>
> My Thoughts:
>
> I thought that such moves were what M$ and FrApple would have
> done, make
> existing hard ware obsolete. If this is true its absolutely
> terrible news for
> ubuntu fans, what it might mean is migrating to another linux
> which will
> support a wider range of processors.
>
> What do other folks think about this
>
> **
> To find out what processor you have use this in the command line
>
> -$ uname -m
>
> **
>
> ram
>
> --
> ubuntu-in mailing list
> ubuntu-in at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:ubuntu-in at lists.ubuntu.com>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
>
>
> Perhaps to me, this is a great news. Old hardware are not going to
> survive anymore. Where do one find the Motherboards/RAMS/PATA-HDD etc
> if one got to replace it. The Manufacturers already had obsoleted it.
> So, its really safe time to take such move. And, it will give better
> optimizations.
>
> And there are always rare-cases (else, why the word RARE). I am sure,
> it would not disappoint 99.99% of ubuntu users.
>
>
>
Yes i agree on this point
More information about the ubuntu-in
mailing list