Suggestion (Re to Jonathan Aquilina)

[Phill Whiteside]

As we have the choice of

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Tag#Unsupported_Version which is for
pages that are 100% 'old versions' and
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Tag#Needs_Updating for pages where the
information is supported versions, but needs editing to include the latest
versions I think we have enough tags. That 2nd tag is the "newcomer" to the
'tag - team' :)
If someone edits a wiki page that is tagged 'unsupported version' and it
then holds supported versions as well, that tag can then be removed.
If someone edits a wiki page that is tagged 'needs updating' and it then
holds the latest release notes as well, that tag can then be removed.

Is my logic okay with everyone?

Regards,

Phill.


On 17 September 2013 14:07, Svetlana Belkin <barsookmud at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 09/17/2013 03:25 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Ben that is why i suggested tags of supported versions on each page and
> > unsupported versions in case people might be running an  EOL version.
>
> Sorry for butting in.
>
> The problem is (and it was said one Tag wiki page) using too many tags
> will cause clutter on the pages themselves.  Though, while this this a
> problem, these tags also help users to see which pages have that tag.
>
> Since this is really the only option we have, couldn't we make this
> system for tagging unsupported versions (while ignoring the other tags)
> work for everyone with cluttering up the wiki pages?
>
> Or am I getting it wrong?
>
> Svetlana Belkin
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130917/fe143416/attachment.html>