Documentation system requirements

[Jonathan Aquilina]

At this point though phill if we are going to use alfresco, i need to work
on a juju charm for deployment. I was told that alfresco does work with the
open jdk which seems to be a requirement but errors under load. If we can
get that sorted out we could actually eliminate the need for somethign
custom made.


On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Phill Whiteside <PhillW at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
>
> if by infrastructure you mean a server setup, I can provide you with that.
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
>
>
> On 10 October 2013 07:16, Jonathan Aquilina <eagles051387 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I was looking at alfresco which is quite nice but would need to be tested
>> and fixed in terms of getting it to work with the open jdk. is it possible
>> to request some infrastructure to do some testing in terms of alfresco?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Benjamin Kerensa <bkerensa at ubuntu.com>wrote:
>>
>>> If this is something you wanted to do as your own project then go for
>>> it, but I do not think Canonical is going to invest time or
>>> infrastructure into something like this. We already use Launchpad for
>>> revision control and it works quite nicely.
>>>
>>> To build a platform from the ground up seems like a lot of work not to
>>> say that it cannot be done but in the past we looked at other
>>> platforms like SUMO which have hundreds of Mozilla Developers working
>>> on it and found it to not be the right fit.
>>>
>>> The problem lies in that there has not been one solution to harness
>>> all the things.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
>>> <eagles051387 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I am looking at spear heading a development project that will involve
>>> the
>>> > creation of a single document management system where we can track
>>> versions
>>> > of pages as well as images / screen shots.
>>> >
>>> > The end goal will be to consolidate all forms of documentation onto a
>>> single
>>> > framework.
>>> >
>>> > I am aware of already existing solutions, but the problem is that they
>>> > probably do not meet the requirements set out by canonical or are not
>>> mature
>>> > enough yet.
>>> >
>>> > The question is what would you guys want in such a system? In a way a
>>> web
>>> > based platform has already been decided as I was informed by a
>>> canonical
>>> > staff member that the framework I had in mind is quite widely used by
>>> > canonical in a number of projects.
>>> >
>>> > Looking forward to the feed back.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jonathan Aquilina
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > ubuntu-doc mailing list
>>> > ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Benjamin Kerensa
>>> http://benjaminkerensa.com
>>> "I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Aquilina
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-doc mailing list
>> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>>
>> --
>> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc>
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20131010/ac115cff/attachment.html>