Calling for Server Guide reviewers/contributors - - TRUSTY

[Patrick Thölken]

Sounds good

Short Message because it's send from my iPhone.

> On Dec 13, 2013, at 9:56 PM, "Peter Matulis" <peter.matulis at canonical.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/13/2013 01:00 PM, Spencer Krum wrote:
>> The other question is do we have to conform to some Ubuntu look and feel
>> guide. Making the server guide look like opsschool will be pretty easy,
>> making a theme that will look exactly like the server guide does now,
>> with coloring and tinting and branding and such might be much harder.
> 
> Yes, good point.
> 
> Based on the level of contributions in the last 4 years the Ubuntu
> Server Guide is on a trajectory of irrelevance.  We've seen some good
> contributions in the last couple of years (most notably the LXC and
> Multipath chapters) but it has not been enough.
> 
> It would be great if we could maintain the current look and feel but
> it's not an impediment if not.  I'm sure we could Ubuntu-fy it in some
> way.  The most important elements are:
> 
> 1. Accurate information
> 2. Improving contributions (the reason why we're considering dumping
> Docbook).
> 
> ~pmatulis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ubuntu-server mailing list
> ubuntu-server at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
> More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam