Additional Tag Request
Tom Davies
tomcecf at gmail.com
Mon Dec 9 23:01:29 UTC 2013
Hi :)
"Review requested" implies it's something a normal user can't do.
It's an appeal to a higher authority to step in.
I prefer the "Needs updating" because that appears to request that
users should update it and are allowed to do so.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 9 December 2013 19:03, Charles Profitt <indigo196 at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
> The difference for me was that needs updating, in the description, specified that the document needed to be updated for Ubuntu Versions.
>
> I see two issues with that tag and description:
> 1. What about pages that need to be updated for a version of software - such as Joomla going from 3.1 to 3.5
> 2. What about a page that I think needs to be reviewed, but I am not really certain that it needs a change (this lines up with what Penelope said) It would be used with pages that were last edited a while ago and could be tagged by people without having actual knowledge on the software/hardware being documented.
>
> ---- Penelope Stowe <pstowe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
>
>> It might be useful to be able to differentiate between a page that has been
>> reviewed, but not yet updated and one that needs both. There may also be
>> times where a review would be useful, but there isn't an expectations of
>> any changes being needed.
>>
>> ~Penelope
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list