A Though on Redundancy of Community Wiki and Other Forms of Support

[Jonathan Aquilina]

Yes Gunnar the problem is that if there are fixes you have to wait for an
SRU release to be pushed. replicating the official documentation is so that
we don't have two different ways of setting up stuff such an example is
postfix for example. and with community ones aligned to the official ones
it is easier and quicker to make fixes.


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunnarhj at ubuntu.com>wrote:

> On 2013-12-02 14:40, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I feel community docs should be a replication of the official docs
> > but where any amendments or fixes can take place.
>
> Isn't making amendments to and fixes of the *official* docs the very
> reason why this team exists?
>
> --
> Gunnar Hjalmarsson
> https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20131203/cc84311f/attachment-0001.html>