visted verses not yet visited hyperlinks in the resulting html pages

[Tom Davies]

Hi :)
I don't think Matt was saying to drop it.  Just that it's another team's decision/accident and not this one's.  That does make it more difficult to deal with so i personally would also drop it but if you want to pursue it then Matt's suggestion might be a good move, ie treat it as though t wa a deliberate choice and ask them why they thought it looked better that way.  
Regards from 
Tom :)  





>________________________________
> From: Doug Smythies <dsmythies at telus.net>
>To: 'Ubuntu Doc' <ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com> 
>Sent: Friday, 16 August 2013, 15:19
>Subject: RE: visted verses not yet visited hyperlinks in the resulting html pages
> 
>
>
>On 2013.08.16 01:53 Kevin wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Matthew East <matt at mdke.org> wrote:
>>> There probably isn't any history to this - almost certainly it was
>>> done this way because that is the way that the Ubuntu website and
>>> other websites based on the standard Ubuntu theme do links, to ensure
>>> consistency between themes. You could try getting in touch with the
>>> Ubuntu web design team to find out why this design decision was taken.
>
>> Hi, Matt. It looks like that may be the case.
>
>> Doug, it looks like the ubuntu.com stylesheet uses the same colors for
>> both unvisited and visited links as well.
>
>Matt: As always, thanks for chiming in on this one.
>
>While I really don't like it, I'll drop it.
>
>... Doug
>
>
>
>-- 
>ubuntu-doc mailing list
>ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
>https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130816/1990b107/attachment.html>