New to Ubuntu (was Ubuntu-docs Requirements?)

[Benjamin Humphrey]

Am I missing something here, but wouldn't the Ubuntu Manual supersede this
document?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> I'm interested in working on newtoubuntu in the coming weeks. I agree
> that it requires some planning and will aim to kick off a wiki page
> for discussion over the next few days.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On 21/01/2010, Phil Bull <philbull at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 11:05 +0200, Alex Lourie wrote:
> >>         With regards to the New to Ubuntu document, I think it's
> >>         important to
> >>         invest some time in improving it this release cycle. Part of
> >>         that
> >>         improvement process should involve setting out aims for the
> >>         document, so
> >>         that we end up with something focused and useful.
> >
> >> Would you please reiterate the main purpose of the document in one
> >> line?
> >
> > I'd be making it up off the top of my head, but here goes:
> >
> > "The New to Ubuntu document should welcome users to Ubuntu, help to
> > familiarise them with the desktop, provide explanations to concepts
> > which they are likely to get stuck with, and point towards further
> > information."
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > --
> > Phil Bull
> > https://launchpad.net/~philbull
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> Matthew East
> http://www.mdke.org
> gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>



-- 
Benjamin Humphrey

Ubuntu Manual Project Leader
Dunedin, New Zealand

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-manual
www.interesting.co.nz
www.benjaminhumphreyphotography.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20100121/9bc9ffd9/attachment.html>