request for review of Ubuntu 10.04 Release Candidate announcement

[Phillip Whiteside]

whispers quietly...
I don't suppose there's any chance of a mention of Lubuntu RC being
included? Please don't shout at me, it's a very young project but it does
work, just not to LTS standards.

Regards,

Phill.

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Steve Langasek <
steve.langasek at canonical.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the input.
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:55:19PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:12:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Hi all,
>
> > > Here is a draft for the Ubuntu 10.04 RC email announcement:
>
> > >   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/RCAnnouncement
>
> > > Please review and advise me of any problems.
>
> > maybe some info about the armel variant of ubuntu netbook would be worth
> > mentioning?  jamie and I thought about something like this:
>
> > === Ubuntu Netbook (on ARM) ===
>
> > The ARM optimised variant of Ubuntu Netbook comes with a lightweight
> application
> > selection tailored specifically for ARM deployments. It ships with a web
> based
> > office and mail solution and a launcher that works with and without
> graphics acceleration
>
> I've included this text with slight adjustments, thanks.
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 02:10:58PM +0100, Gerry Carr wrote:
> > +1 - I was going to say that ARM is missing and missing below is a
> > location for the armel release candidate download.
>
> The armel release candidate is downloadable from the same location as the
> release candidate for i386 - does this really need to be called out
> explicitly, given that this was already the case for 9.10?
>
> The exception is OMAP, which is a late-landing best-effort release and not
> something we're supporting formally - and the latest test results from
> Oliver indicate we don't even have an installable OMAP netbook image for
> RC.
> Unless there are specific reasons we need to mention the OMAP build, I
> don't
> think we should draw attention to it at all here.  Do you disagree?
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:57:43PM +0100, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> > If we need to add a disclaimer about the non-LTS nature of this release
> we
> > could add the following:
> >
> > ""Due to the rapidly changing nature of the ARM ecosphere, the decision
> > was made not to support this release as an LTS"
>
> Ubuntu Netbook is already not an LTS, so I don't think there's a need for
> further disclaimers.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
> Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
> slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIVAwUBS8/j4FaNMPMhshM9AQjRtQ/+IQeQR3aSIYPG3yLkCP9eNCsbaoSv2rI2
> gH8PhrIRspa/Tdo5GLooIbRvjuQRAqbyS0BmabdPzcsrSjSMaN4HcPhNUDOnGZ5P
> hGnCMl/dYt3qbDqbKu6iBGigHe4MFyaBP2smn7qSXXYziYgU87Z3SWmUP4vN1bqS
> HNILO2W9hPHFpTuoZZEUtCYISpZ+e00/UKhO2oB0P0oyhqT7z4ZJlVMXlPEScRiM
> 0OSA9jpDDSUtZblk5Wslk0ESprtbn/TXUDDKnfd4EsZuNVkc0s5+D7QwWsCbfOYn
> Is8kIFdRuWWjiTcJrLptIEJyRRSj+utFComYzpbIyMshufSoK6MbCE+cQvmSeebp
> /y1bwvEz7tbLZMd9VkG1RBqtMOX5cXCDdeJdZOB9dwAFKK7st3jtNYg32kuHal1R
> TkHZS4Fql2rcR6xXkeclgzrb+t/nPIERO8Taa6jq8PKWYbHLtLujgaKGqwN6+S3q
> 47SCe2GW7cs05WJ6YoB3iki9SvfBcduKNVJFMyX1ZmhL0m/Au40M+KnYLygF4Ek/
> ocEVVZdQfs1o8E9Qrod8WCi/Rv6PFaEvQ2972qdXWy27EW2ehpCrjYGKb07L3uoY
> Bqoyryxef1+FFToX+sSbyhuBzEcEms8yJfl4C64WLQ4tBUMnAXd7uS53cgotKta/
> RY9zrrX3aJI=
> =CCun
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20100423/270e8398/attachment.html>