request for review of Ubuntu 10.04 Release Candidate announcement

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Rick,

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:05:08PM -0700, Rick Spencer wrote:
> Would it appropriate to mention the change back to Google as the default
> search provider anywhere?

By and large, I expect the target audience for the announcement will be
unfamiliar with the controversy surrounding the switch; so for most people
it won't be noteworthy that we're using Google since that's what was already
used in 9.10 and earlier, and I think it would miss the mark to draw
attention to this in the RC announcement.  Do you think that we still need
to do more to spread the word about the switch back, and set the record
straight?  Would a separate mail to ubuntu-devel-announce perhaps be more
appropriate?

> On a related note, I suppose since it's a Critical and Confirmed bug:
> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/565981
> Should be in the release notes.

Difficult to see so far where the right place to document this is given that
it's not yet clear if it's going to be fixed prior to release, but yes, I'll
make sure this gets documented for RC.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20100421/9d9ee4dc/attachment.pgp>