Ubuntu Documentation and UDS-M

[Kyle Nitzsche]

HI Elizabeth.

I am Kyle. I work for Canonical.

Look forward to seeing you at UDS!

Cheers,
Kyle

Elizabeth Krumbach wrote:
> 2010/4/6 David Planella <david.planella at ubuntu.com>:
>   
>> El dt 06 de 04 de 2010 a les 19:19 +0100, en/na Matthew East va
>> escriure:
>>     
>>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Kyle Nitzsche
>>> <kyle.nitzsche at canonical.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> With UDS coming up, what sessions on Ubuntu documentation should there be?
>>>>         
>>> Ordinarily, not many ubuntu-doc members make it to UDS. As a result we
>>> don't tend to run sessions on documentation at UDS. That doesn't mean
>>> that sessions shouldn't be run and topics discussed if enough people
>>> are interested, just that it's not a safe way for us to take decisions
>>> as a team.
>>>
>>> However, most of the topics you've mentioned (possibly even the ones
>>> which have been debated ad infinitum already on the list) are
>>> deserving of discussion within the team, and I think the best way to
>>> do so is to schedule one or more team meetings to discuss them either
>>> late in this release cycle or early in the next one.
>>>
>>>       
>> I just wanted to add that UDS sessions can still be a good opportunity
>> to discuss these, even if many doc team members cannot physically make
>> it there. We've got IRC for the particular session projected in every
>> UDS room and in addition sound from the rooms is also streamed.
>>
>> What I'm trying to say is that if the topics deserve a team meeting (or
>> more than one), why not make such meetings coincide with UDS sessions
>> for each topic? The only downsides I can see are that the sessions are
>> during the week and on CEST time, but I'm not sure how much of an
>> impediment these can be.
>>     
>
> I like this idea.
>
> I'll be attending UDS and if there are any doc sessions scheduled I
> would make it a priority to attend.
>
> Also, I know Benjamin Humphrey from -manual applied for sponsorship
> and is interested in a session about collaboration possibilities (both
> with -docs and -learning).
>
>