Usage of apturl in the documentation

[Matthew East]

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Dougie Richardson
<ddrichardson at btinternet.com> wrote:
> Matthew,
>
>> No, not at all. It promotes the notion that different groups in our
>> community have different skills and are more suited to different
>> tasks. That's true of documentation, development, artwork, marketing,
>> and so on. All those contributions are valuable, and all of them are
>> different. Deferring to the development team on a technical issue is
>> nothing to do with making some contributions more valuable than
>> others, it's just good sense.
>
> It's a legitimate concern for which the argument has been to patronize and insult me (paranoid and now lacking sense)

Dude, that's the second time you've taken general words of mine and
turned them into an insult to you. In the first case I could see how
you got there so I wanted to clarify that I hadn't intended them to be
insulting, but in this case I genuinely don't understand how you have
twisted my words that far.

I'm not going to continue posting to this thread in case it happens again.

I think something we can all agree on is that your concern over
apturl, whether valid or not, is a general one rather than one which
affects the help wiki, so the best way to clarify it is to discuss it
with those responsible for having implementing apturl in Ubuntu. Maybe
Michael, still cc:ed here, can help.

-- 
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF