Concrete proposal to moving to bzr

[Jordan Mantha]

On 10/24/07, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hi Cody,
>
> On 21/10/2007, Cody A.W. Somerville <cody-somerville at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > This is just trivial but I would think that ubuntu-doc-core (or
> > ubuntu-doc-teams) would be the umbrella group since the semantic for the
> > other teams is "<team name>-doc". If you agree, it would also be trivial to
> > correct.
>
> I have to say that I don't really follow the argument. I don't have a
> problem with different teams in the ubuntu-doc umbrella to have
> different names depending on what they do (both in relation to the
> committers team, the wiki team and the proposed mentees team).

Ah, I see Cody's point I think. According to the "normal" conventions
we've been using for naming LP  teams we use <team name>-doc like
edubuntu-doc, kubuntu-doc, etc.  This makes ubuntu-core-doc seem like
the documentation wing of an ubuntu-core team and perhaps confusing
with ubuntu-core-dev . As long as the team description is clear I
don't think it matters all that much but I think I would've gone with
ubuntu-doc-core.

-Jordan