Proposed schedule change

Jonathan Jesse jjesse at iserv.net
Wed Mar 15 16:53:26 UTC 2006


On Wednesday 15 March 2006 11:36, Matthew East wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 07:33 -0500, Jonathan Jesse wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 March 2006 03:16, Matthew East wrote:
> > > > I'd be in favour of either (a) not moving the documentation freeze at
> > > > all (March 23rd) or (b) delaying a maximum of 2 weeks (April 6th).
> > >
> > > I'd like to hear more from the various people taking care of the
> > > guides. I know that the Packaging Guide could do with 2 more weeks,
> > > what about the Server guide and other Kubuntu docs?
> > >
> > > Matt
> >
> > I don't know how much Kubuntu espresso witll change any of the documents.
>
> As far as I can see, it will only impact on release notes. The desktop
> guide does not have a section on installing. Espresso itself comes with
> documentation. In any event, kde-espresso is already available, and can
> be documented from now.
>
> > I think 2
> > weeks would be great that puts us at April 6?
>
> It would yes but I'm finding it difficult to see whether we actually
> need it or not. The only documents that seem to need it are the
> Packaging Guide, (possibly) Server Guide for reviewing and (possibly)
> Release Notes.
>
> We could do a staggered freeze for these, but I'm not sure I like that
> idea. How about 1 extra week to polish off the review on Release Notes,
> the Server Guide and Desktop Guides, with extra leave for Jordan to work
> past the freeze on the Packaging Guide (I'm not so fussed about
> translation starting ASAP for the packaging guide).
>
> Anyone else have any more views on this?
>
> Matt

I would go with that, extending the doc freeze one week for all but the 
packaging guide




More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list