Quality assurance on the help wiki

[Paul O'Malley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthew East wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Paul O'Malley:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is a rather simple proposal anything that is in CategoryCleanup
>>> for over six months or is three months into the next release's cycle
>>> should be put into a  CategoryReview.
> 
> I'm not sure I fully understand what your proposal is about, and how it
> affects other Ubuntu subdomains... But if I understand at least the
> general feel of your post, you are raising the point that it would be
> nice to have a mechanism by which users can quickly identify how
> trustworthy a particular page on the wiki is.
> 
> The CategoryCleanup mechanism was a rudimentary way to begin doing this,
> while providing the people working on the wiki with a list of pages that
> need work. However, it is quite right that this system isn't actually
> helping the users at all.
> 
Hi,

I showed this to a friend who said the following.

"How about marking all the pages that are generated during the life span
of one version with a the version number of the release.
[Exception where it refers to the LTS - the editors choice on that one.]
Then they can be naturally degraded."

Regards,

Paul
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEtCbToWm0gT2CRXkRAguSAJ9itycEbo+7iIqLHsvT4G0CA9L8DACfbMs+
MulMQmEZaxm3c0zhokmh+RM=
=WYhi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----