CommonQuestions

[Matthew East]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

* Francis Giannaros:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> On Sunday 09 July 2006 17:44, Matthew East wrote:
>> Well, my view is that it has everything to do with it. I think that
>> sub-headings which contain long and/or multiple questions aren't useful
>> on a table of contents, because they aren't scannable. Reducing them to
>> proper headings would probably make a big difference.
> 
> No, I'm sorry but you're missing the point[s] here again.

I think I'm understanding the point.

> This is remark you 
> made before (which I fully agree with; that is: the oft superiority of 
> sub-headings without fully phrased sentences), but as I've said, it doesn't 
> address the other palpable issues with having that table of contents 
> structure.
> 
> You say not having full phrased questions in the sub-headings is a better 
> idea? Fine and dandy, I totally agree; this is something that should be 
> implemented *regardless* of which form we decide to use.

No, I'm saying that not having full phrased question in the sub-headings
is essential before including such headings in a table of contents (see
the first paragraph from my previous email quoted above).

As I said in my first email, I understand that a table of contents is
useful. I think that if the headings on that page are improved to make
them shorter and more easily scannable, it would be an advantage to
increase the number of levels in the table of contents.

Hope I'm being clearer now!

Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEsfkJtSaF0w5rBv8RArNTAJ4qY+5UW6Fjc0dJ6JG4PtfFdhgMxwCeMkWt
8OPus2eH4qgRFxL/hBFVZxg=
=7jaP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----