wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareEquivalents
Mehdi Hassanpour
mehdi.public at gmail.com
Wed Dec 6 06:09:47 UTC 2006
Hi Jon,
Nice work! . I think as all these pages belong to one title
"SoftwareEquivalents", it's better to have each section as a wiki
sub-page...
I added some more software to Internet page and would like to start an
Office page, let me know if you agree with creating sub-pages...
Bests
--Mehdi
On 01/12/06, Jon Pruett <montanamax at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I'm new to the group and starting to port over the pages in the old
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CategoryDocumentation to the new community wiki.
> The technical process makes sense to me (I did a couple simple pages last
> night), but I have a question that is more content related.
>
> Should the SoftwareEquivalents page and it's branches be ported even
> though they are on the CategoryDocumentation list?
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareEquivalents
>
> That page has the following branches populated to a varying degree with
> information -
>
> SoftwareEquivalentsBusiness (1 item)
> SoftwareEquivalentsCAD (3 items)
> SoftwareEquivalentsElectronic (really a list of specialized Linux CAD
> applications without Windows equivalents)
> SoftwareEquivalentsInternet (7 lines, most items mentioned in other parts
> of the community wiki)
> SoftwareEquivalentsMisc (1 item with an existing dedicated community wiki
> page)
> SoftwareEquivalentsMultimedia (3 items with a very well built, dedicated
> community wiki page)
>
> My concern is for duplication of information and confusing of end users.
> I'm leaning towards "yes, we should port the pages not in their current
> format". I think the main Software Equivalents page could remain as it does
> have value for new to Linux users understanding what new applications they
> can use to solve current needs. But I think the page should be made more of
> a jumping point to existing wiki pages such as
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MultimediaApplications and create new
> pages for things like the CAD software. I think this could be more
> productive than listing of one for one "old application vs new application
> and fit better into the community wiki style and format.
>
> I wanted to get feedback/direction/ideas from the team before proceding.
> All polite feedback is appreciated, flames cheerfully ignored. :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Jon "MontanaMax" Pruett
>
> _________________________________________________________
> -| There is serenity in Chaos.
> -| Seek ye the Eye of the Hurricane.
> -| Montana Max - Illegitimi non carborundum!
> _________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
--
********************************************************
Yours Sincerely, Mehdi Hassanpour
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/* Of one Essence is the human race,
Thusly has Creation put the Base;
One Limb impacted is sufficient,
For all Others to feel the Mace.
~Saadi (persian poet) -1258 */
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://ImPersian.com | http://Hezardastan.org
********************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20061206/750555a9/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list