Hi Jon,<br><br>Nice work! . I think as all these pages belong to one
title "SoftwareEquivalents", it's better to have each section as a wiki
sub-page... <br>I added some more software to Internet page and would
like to start an Office page, let me know if you agree with creating
sub-pages...
<br><br>Bests<br><br> --Mehdi<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 01/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jon Pruett</b> <<a href="mailto:montanamax@yahoo.com">montanamax@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I'm new to the group and starting to port over the pages in the old <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CategoryDocumentation">
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CategoryDocumentation</a> to the new community wiki. The technical process makes sense to me (I did a couple simple pages last night), but I have a question that is more content related.<br><br>Should the SoftwareEquivalents page and it's branches be ported even though they are on the CategoryDocumentation list?
<br><br><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareEquivalents">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareEquivalents</a><br><br>That page has the following branches populated to a varying degree with information -<br><br>SoftwareEquivalentsBusiness (1 item)
<br>SoftwareEquivalentsCAD (3 items)<br>SoftwareEquivalentsElectronic (really a list of specialized Linux CAD applications without Windows equivalents)<br>SoftwareEquivalentsInternet (7 lines, most items mentioned in other parts of the community wiki)
<br>SoftwareEquivalentsMisc (1 item with an existing dedicated community wiki page)<br>SoftwareEquivalentsMultimedia (3 items with a very well built, dedicated community wiki page)<br><br>My concern is for duplication of information and confusing of end users. I'm leaning towards "yes, we should port the pages not in their current format". I think the main Software Equivalents page could remain as it does have value for new to Linux users understanding what new applications they can use to solve current needs. But I think the page should be made more of a jumping point to existing wiki pages such as
<a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MultimediaApplications">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MultimediaApplications</a> and create new pages for things like the CAD software. I think this could be more productive than listing of one for one "old application vs new application and fit better into the community wiki style and format.
<br><br>I wanted to get feedback/direction/ideas from the team before proceding. All polite feedback is appreciated, flames cheerfully ignored. :)<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>- Jon "MontanaMax" Pruett<br><br>_________________________________________________________
<br>-| There is serenity in Chaos.<br>-| Seek ye the Eye of the Hurricane.<br>-| Montana Max - Illegitimi non carborundum!<br>_________________________________________________________<br><br>
<br><br>--<br>ubuntu-doc mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-doc@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br><a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>********************************************************<br>Yours Sincerely, Mehdi Hassanpour<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>/* Of one Essence is the human race,<br>Thusly has Creation put the Base;<br>One Limb impacted is sufficient,<br>For all Others to feel the Mace.<br> ~Saadi (persian poet) -1258 */<br>----------------------------------------------------------------------
<br><a href="http://ImPersian.com">http://ImPersian.com</a> | <a href="http://Hezardastan.org">http://Hezardastan.org</a><br>********************************************************