Conversion of Quicktour to Docbook

[Sean Wheller]

On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:02, Matthew East wrote:
> > I wondered why you did this. The Quicktour was much much easier to
> > hack in XHTML and was translatable. XHTML is also much more likely to
> > be known by the nascent marketing team than DocBook. In other words, I
> > don't see any gain from it frankly.
>
> Agreed. Undiscussed major changes like this disturb our work
>
> Sean, either work with us, or not at all, please.


Hmmm, I was preparing a two col PDF flyer out of it. Of course if you don't 
want it, you don't have to use it. I did not remove the HTML version, just 
made a duplicate in XML.

-- 
Sean Wheller
Technical Author
sean at inwords.co.za
084-854-9408
http://www.inwords.co.za
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Registered Linux User #375355
http://wenzani.blogspot.com/