Sec: Unclassified - New contributions without docbook
George Deka
george.deka at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 04:03:20 UTC 2005
On 18/10/05, Jerome Gotangco <jgotangco at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's also worth mentioning that if a contribution is written in OOo 2
> ODT format, it can be easily exported to DocBook. Attached is a sample
> output I ripped from our wiki and transferred to OOo and exported to
> Docbook XML.
>
> What does this mean for us? If a contributor sends in ODT, we export
> to DocBook and check for validity. Barrier #1 closed.
>
>
> Have not tried it but if your correct, lets just say we will take
contributions in ODT or docbook, make our life easier. If people can write
it so easily in OOo2 then why not, moin takes longer to write IMO.
The other option is, can we export the wiki into oo2 then into docbook
My vote is OOo2 or Docbook are the only accepted solutions, however we are
at our discretion able to pull out of the wiki.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20051018/253249a1/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list