possible documentation viewer?

[Sean Wheller]

On Friday 03 June 2005 21:08, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > What you now ask is for us go go backward in capabilities.
>
> Not at all. That's precisely what we have right now, and it's sufficient to
> provide a good user experience with existing documentation.

I think that your idea of a good user experience and the expectations of the 
user are very different. The doc-team have listen to a number of user 
complaints and failing to find a solution in yelp, we have decided to 
transform to static HTML.

>
> > I can get a heck of a lot more done than what we can get done with Yelp.
> > Now why should we give up the ability to do so just because yelp does not
> > support it. Earlier you asked me to rationalize the requirements, well I
> > think I may just have done this in the above. If I was to listthem point
> > for point they would all culminate in the above answer.
>
> But your answer doesn't actually state anything.

Why settle for less when you can have more.

-- 
Sean Wheller
Technical Author
sean at inwords.co.za
084-854-9408
http://www.inwords.co.za
Registered Linux User #375355
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20050604/80c10f44/attachment.pgp>