[long] Canonical are you serious?

[Nick Loeve]

Matt Zimmerman wrote:

>On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:48:30PM +1100, Nick Loeve wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>#1 is up to you guys: whatever will enable you to work most effectively.
>>>I will chase down #2 once #1 is decided.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I have never used bazaar, but i don't mind either way. I am sure i can 
>>work it out if we use bazaar. It is being actively developed by 
>>ubuntu'ers isn't it? Would it reduce the impact of versions/features in 
>>the future for the doc team's RCS if we use it?
>>    
>>
>
>Bazaar is a Canonical-sponsored project.  I have little doubt that Bazaar
>will be the best long-term solution for you guys, but I question whether the
>current release will be suitable for you, and whether the developers have
>the resources to provide you with the support that I expect you will need.
>
>My suggestion is that you invite Robert Collins or another represenative of
>the Arch team to one of your documentation meetings, and talk to him about
>your revision control needs.  He will be able to answer your questions with
>more authority and detail than I would.
>
>  
>

Hey Guys,

What about a meeting to sort this out? 

I am moving house this week so i will not have internet at home. I can be online at work, but i might not be able to participate actively.

I don't mind if i miss out, but Enrico this might be a good time to invite Robert and any other parties we think are necessary. A formal invitation to our group might also help raise the status of the docteam???

Dunno... as i said i might not be able to participate, so i don't wanna push anyone into anything...

Cheers
;) trickie (Nick Loeve)