Documentation development infrastructure

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 07:53 +0200, Sean Wheller wrote:
> 
> Agreed. Bazaar is perfect for our needs but then so is SVN. I don't
> really 
> believe the problem is the technology platforms here. It's a human
> issue. 
> Don't get me wrong, I know that can sound arrogant. But it's the
> truth, both 
> systems can support the requirement I am suggesting. However, upgrade
> to 
> newer SVN will create headaches for sysadmins and moving to bazaar
> will 
> create headaches for the writers. It's a catch 22. Unless of course
> the 
> writers are prepared to bite the bullet and go for it? If not then it
> will 
> just have to wait.

Hi Sean,
	I'm curious in what ways Bazaar will create headaches for the writers -
we're keen to make the UI of Bazaar better and better. While it lends
itself to distributed archives, it works fine with a single shared
repository too. 

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20050202/803f84e0/attachment.pgp>