[long] Canonical are you serious?

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Feb 2 08:06:56 UTC 2005

On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:27 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:48:30PM +1100, Nick Loeve wrote:
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >#1 is up to you guys: whatever will enable you to work most effectively.
> > >I will chase down #2 once #1 is decided.
> > >
> > I have never used bazaar, but i don't mind either way. I am sure i can 
> > work it out if we use bazaar. It is being actively developed by 
> > ubuntu'ers isn't it? Would it reduce the impact of versions/features in 
> > the future for the doc team's RCS if we use it?
> Bazaar is a Canonical-sponsored project.  I have little doubt that Bazaar
> will be the best long-term solution for you guys, but I question whether the
> current release will be suitable for you, and whether the developers have
> the resources to provide you with the support that I expect you will need.
> My suggestion is that you invite Robert Collins or another represenative of
> the Arch team to one of your documentation meetings, and talk to him about
> your revision control needs.  He will be able to answer your questions with
> more authority and detail than I would.

I'll happily attend a meeting and discuss stuff in detail - sorry its
taken me so long to reply to this mail, last week was fairly insane.


GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20050202/c049c81d/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list