Creating consensus regarding page types in wiki

[Ben Edwards]

Thats common sence to me - i've been developing interfaces for 0ver 15 years.

Not exactly sure what your point is.  My point was that the wiki and
the official/polished documentation are diferent.  I think the wiki
should be as easy as posible for new users to edit and the
documentation use a very flexable standardised markup.

I think having the wiki looking a little diference is good.  Users on
the main site who do a search and end up on a wiki page may be
'suprised' if it is not as polished as the main site.

There seems to be a bit of confusion here - there is a big diference
between the requierments of a wiki and a documentasion CMS.

Ben

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:51:42 +0100, sparkes <sparkes at westmids.biz> wrote:
> Ben Edwards wrote:
> 
> >
> > I actually think one of the problems is the wiki is TOO integrated -
> > the distinction between the wiki and main website is practically
> > non-existent from the point of view of the casual visitor.
> 
> 
> google for 'the principle of least astonishment' and then come back and
> explain that comment in the light of what you learn ;-)
> 
> sparkes
> 
> --
> <davee> "Sparkes, the Pete Best of LugRadio"
> 
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
> 


-- 
Ben Edwards - Poole, UK, England
WARNING:This email contained partisan views - dont ever accuse me of
using the veneer of objectivity
If you have a problem emailing me use
http://www.gurtlush.org.uk/profiles.php?uid=4
(email address this email is sent from may be defunct)