Licencing of Documentation
sivan at piware.de
Tue Nov 9 21:05:40 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 20:41 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:17:21PM +0000, Louise McCance-Price wrote:
> > I said I'd find out about the licensing of documentation.
> > It appears the winner is: GFDL
> > let me know your thoughts on this.
> Two questions:
> 1) GFDL documentation cannot currently go into Debian main. Is there a
> reason why GFDL has been chosen even if it has this problem?
> 2) (more practical) do we track invariant sections in the wiki, or we
> say that wiki pages shouldn't have invariant sections except when
> approved by someone/some group?
I must join enrico on this, Lulu maybe you have an idea?
More information about the ubuntu-doc