Licencing of Documentation

[Sivan Green]

On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 20:41 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:17:21PM +0000, Louise McCance-Price wrote:
> 
> > I said I'd find out about the licensing of documentation.
> > It appears the winner is:    GFDL
> > let me know your thoughts on this.
> 
> Two questions:
>  
>  1) GFDL documentation cannot currently go into Debian main.  Is there a
>     reason why GFDL has been chosen even if it has this problem?
> 
>  2) (more practical) do we track invariant sections in the wiki, or we
>     say that wiki pages shouldn't have invariant sections except when
>     approved by someone/some group?

I must join enrico on this, Lulu maybe you have an idea?

Sivan