Licencing of Documentation

[Enrico Zini]

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:17:21PM +0000, Louise McCance-Price wrote:

> I said I'd find out about the licensing of documentation.
> It appears the winner is:    GFDL
> let me know your thoughts on this.

Two questions:
 
 1) GFDL documentation cannot currently go into Debian main.  Is there a
    reason why GFDL has been chosen even if it has this problem?

 2) (more practical) do we track invariant sections in the wiki, or we
    say that wiki pages shouldn't have invariant sections except when
    approved by someone/some group?


Ciao,

Enrico

--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico at enricozini.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20041109/1ee5923e/attachment.pgp>