Licencing of Documentation
Louise McCance-Price
lu at canonical.com
Mon Nov 8 18:17:21 UTC 2004
Hi all
I said I'd find out about the licensing of documentation.
It appears the winner is: GFDL
let me know your thoughts on this.
best
Lu
Sivan Green wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 08:11, George Deka wrote:
>
>
>>Hi All,
>>In follow up to what i had metioned during the meeting, i said i
>>thought there was an issue with using GPL as our licence. Having
>>remebered what my issues were with it i shall try and explain.
>>An issue that i have seen raised is the source of documenation. Are we
>>able to meet the requirements of the GPL on re-distribution of the
>>source.
>>
>>
>
>As we are currently in transit to using a DocBook repository and using
>it as our document stadarnd source, I don't think this should be any
>problem. Moreover, there are already several access method (e.g. yelp)
>that use most of the documents in their source form, so this is even
>desirable.
>
>Anyone care to correct me if I'm wrong?
>
>Sivan
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list