juju-izing udd

[Martin Pool]

Lucid would be smoothest, but it turns out the juju agents don't currently
support anything before Natty.
On Dec 22, 2011 11:56 PM, "John Meinel" <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote:

>
> On Dec 22, 2011 1:37 PM, "Jelmer Vernooij" <jelmer at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > Am 22/12/11 08:11, schrieb Martin Pool:
> > > I'm going to try writing a Juju charm for the udd importer.
> > W00t!
> > >
> > > (time passes)
> > >
> > > Well, I did start, but I got bogged down in debugging why my lxc
> > > provider won't boot.  Details and tiny patches on the juju list (which
> > > you should join.)  If someone else wants to have a go, please do.
> > >
> > > Plan:
> > >  * it runs on Lucid, so we need a lucid charm
> > Is there actually a requirement to have it run on lucid? It might be
> > nicer to run it on oneiric, as various packages are more recent there.
>
> Production machines in Canonical's datacenter run LTS releases. I think
> the Canonistack machines are running O underneath the VM. I'm guessing that
> starting with a Lucid guest to match the existing machine would be the
> smoothest transition.
>
> John
>
> --
> ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-distributed-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-distributed-devel/attachments/20111223/35848e25/attachment.html>