Lucid would be smoothest, but it turns out the juju agents don't currently support anything before Natty. <div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 22, 2011 11:56 PM, "John Meinel" <<a href="mailto:john@arbash-meinel.com">john@arbash-meinel.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Dec 22, 2011 1:37 PM, "Jelmer Vernooij" <<a href="mailto:jelmer@canonical.com" target="_blank">jelmer@canonical.com</a>> wrote: > > Am 22/12/11 08:11, schrieb Martin Pool: > > I'm going to try writing a Juju charm for the udd importer. > W00t! > > > > (time passes) > > > > Well, I did start, but I got bogged down in debugging why my lxc > > provider won't boot. Details and tiny patches on the juju list (which > > you should join.) If someone else wants to have a go, please do. > > > > Plan: > > * it runs on Lucid, so we need a lucid charm > Is there actually a requirement to have it run on lucid? It might be > nicer to run it on oneiric, as various packages are more recent there. Production machines in Canonical's datacenter run LTS releases. I think the Canonistack machines are running O underneath the VM. I'm guessing that starting with a Lucid guest to match the existing machine would be the smoothest transition. John -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com</a> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel</a> </blockquote></div>