bzr/LP issues from work discussed at UDS

Robert Collins robertc at
Tue Jan 12 01:48:15 GMT 2010

On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 12:52 +1100, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> FWIW I think the “;key=value” syntax is fine, although obviously
> there's
> some scope for debating what keys and values to allow... “branch=NICK”
> for
> colocated branches seems fine to me, and “revid=REVID” and
> “revno=NNN” seem like obvious choices as well. 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : 

More information about the ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list