bzr/LP issues from work discussed at UDS

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 12:52 +1100, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> 
> 
> FWIW I think the “;key=value” syntax is fine, although obviously
> there's
> some scope for debating what keys and values to allow... “branch=NICK”
> for
> colocated branches seems fine to me, and “revid=REVID” and
> “revno=NNN” seem like obvious choices as well. 

+1

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-distributed-devel/attachments/20100112/a481c397/attachment.pgp