Recipes vs. Looms vs. pipelines

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>>>>>> "Aaron" == Aaron Bentley <aaron at canonical.com> writes:
> 
> <snip/>
> 
>     Aaron> That is fine with me, but do you have any comments on
>     Aaron> the original issue?
> 
>     Aaron> The original discussion was about "down-thread; pull; up-thread -a"
>     Aaron> feeling more natural than "pull -d submit:; merge; commit;".  It wasn't
>     Aaron> about the advantages of stacks when you have multiple lines of
>     Aaron> development, it was about the loom workflow feeling more natural even
>     Aaron> when you only had one line of development.
> 
> That's not how I understood it, but I've been wrong before :-D
> 
> So yes, I find the loom workflow feeling more natural.
> 
> But that's not really relevant (to me and IME) when there is a
> single line of dev. That's mainly because in that case I
> generally don't merge trunk until the submission. And in that
> case I do the merge and resolve the conflicts in my integration
> branch.
> 
> The last times I had to merge trunk in these cases was... long
> ago and mainly had to do with branches left dormant too long.
> 
>     Vincent
> 

Interesting. I have to do it all the time because of NEWS issues...

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksrvIQACgkQJdeBCYSNAAN5zgCfSJnwo5NZCI2U34igOI6917x6
jXAAoJOEoxXf7Z465dGjQdEbCJRqXiYG
=wUVX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----