your thoughts wanted on bzr team UDD focus
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste at canonical.com
Thu Dec 3 22:01:33 GMT 2009
On December 3, 2009, Martin Pool wrote:
> If there are existing bugs relevant to udd, or you know of
> appropriately concrete and self-contained things that can be filed as
> bugs, then tagging them and/or mentioning them here would be helpful.
> It would give us something to be getting on with. But I agree the
> larger issues are too broad to make useful bugs now. (One could have
> placeholder bugs like "work out what to do about X" but I doubt that
> helps.)
>
Actually, given the workflow you guys seem to favour, I think it might be
sense. Otherwise, how to do you track and make sure that somebody drives the
requirements process on these larger issues?
--
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste at canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-distributed-devel/attachments/20091203/7cafceea/attachment.pgp
More information about the ubuntu-distributed-devel
mailing list