default LLVM change
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Sun Mar 27 18:56:20 UTC 2022
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:50:42AM -0300, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> I was going over fixing the postgresql FTBFS[1] reported[2] in this
> list a few days ago, and saw that the failure was due to postgresql
> not yet supporting llvm-14. Current jammy build was using llvm-13.
> Ok, so looks like llvm-defaults changed from 13 to 14 with
> 0.51ubuntu1[3] on March 12th (wasn't that after FF?)
Yes, it's after FF. We know that LLVM releases always land late wrt our
release schedule. This was called out on
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jammy-jellyfish-release-schedule/23906 - no
explicit FFe, just a known part of our toolchain updates.
> Christian found a patchset, which I applied and uploaded, but to my
> surprise llvm-14, even though it's the default in jammy, is in
> universe[4]. UPDATE: was in universe, looks like Doko just moved it
> into main a few hours ago.
> The end results now, with the above update, is that we will have
> postgresql-14 switching from llvm13 to llvm14 one day before beta
> freeze. Release team, should I revert the postgresql change and adjust
> build-depends so it picks llvm-13?
I think you should proceed with the LLVM 14 build. There's time still for
any regressions to be found and fixed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20220327/61578a5e/attachment.sig>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list