+1 maintenance day report

[Brian Murray]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:53:31AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 05:31, Paride Legovini <paride at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> 
> > mathcomp-multinomials:
> >  - holding 3 packages
> >  - missing builds on all archs but riscv64
> >  - reason: missing b-deps (riscv64 got lucky because it slow)
> >  - retriggered builds; built everywhere but on arm64.
> >  - reason for missing arm64 build:
> >    .
> >    The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >     libcoq-mathcomp-bigenough : Depends: libcoq-mathcomp-ssreflect-94ef7
> >    E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> >    .
> >  - HANDOVER: I think we just need a no-change rebuild of
> >    src:mathcomp-bigenough to rebuild against a newer ssreflect.
> >
> 
> I did this.

I like how Paride called out the item to handover to another person on
+1 maintenance in their report (and of course that it was picked up!).
Could we make using this format (HANDOVER) a convention for passing
things on in our reports?

Thanks!
--
Brian Murray