Sponsorship of fix for OpenVDB package in focal

[Lukasz Zemczak]

Hello Richard,

First of all thank you for your contribution! I have now added an
'affects focal' to the bug which will probably make things a bit
clearer regarding what needs to be done. Currently, as far as I know,
the sponsorship queue doesn't have a dedicated rotation so sometimes
it might take a while before a sponsor notices the change and performs
action. That being said, with the bug targeting focal as it should,
it's more probable to happen sooner than later.
If time allows, I'll also try to take look and see if I can help out.

Cheers,

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 14:18, Richard Viney
<richard at lightspeedgraphics.co.nz> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a new contributor attempting to get an issue with focal's openvdb package fixed. The original bug report is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvdb/+bug/1882998
>
> I've done everything I can see for the SRU procedure, i.e. filling out the issue template, doing a debdiff for the change, and subscribing ubuntu-sponsors to the bug.
>
> However, it's been a couple of weeks and I haven't had any response, so I'm wondering if the problem is that the original bug has already been tagged as "Fix Released". It's true that a fix has been released, but only as part of groovy, not as an update to focal, and my aim is to get this regression with openvdb fixed in the current LTS if at all possible (for the reasons outlined in the bug report comments).
>
> Is there anything further I can do to help move this along?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel



-- 
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
 Foundations Team
 lukasz.zemczak at canonical.com
 www.canonical.com