aptdaemon

Steve Langasek steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Wed Mar 15 20:28:30 UTC 2017


On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:44:59PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I believe aptdaemon is effectively abandoned.  It's been removed from Debian
> but it's still hanging around in Ubuntu due to a few reverse dependencies:
> 
> % reverse-depends aptdaemon
> Reverse-Depends
> ===============
> * gnome-software
> * language-selector-gnome
> * oem-config-gtk
> * python-aptdaemon
> * python3-aptdaemon
> * sessioninstaller

I think this is the wrong command and you need 'reverse-depends
src:aptdaemon' to see the actual impact here.  This shows that there are
lots more reverse-dependencies on the python modules.

> I think the gnome-software dependency is unnecessary.  I can't find a
> reference to aptdaemon in the source, and I built a version without it in my
> PPA, tested it in a Zesty VM and it worked fine afaict.  I've prepared a
> version that's ready for upload, which I'd like to do unless someone with more
> knowledge about it objects.  (OTOH, it's not urgent so it can wait until after
> Zesty.)
> 
> That leaves three remaining dependencies (ignoring python{,3}-apdaemon) all of
> which appear legitimate.  Note that language-selector-gnome, oem-config-gtk,
> and sessioninstaller are only in Ubuntu, not in Debian, and each still have
> their own reverse dependencies.
> 
> I bring this up because back in January, I uploaded aptdaemon
> 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu17 which was a contributed fix for LP: #1623856; a problem
> with the minimum window height.  I thought I'd tested the build at the time,
> but I got distracted with other things, and was reminded today that it's
> *still* in -proposed because its failing its tests.  I don't think those tests
> are fixable without a fair bit of work since afaict, they are using obsolete
> APIs that no longer exist.  The version before mine was last uploaded in
> Yakkety, and even trying to build the Yakkety version in Zesty fails.  So my
> changes (as expected) aren't relevant and the package is simply no longer
> buildable in Ubuntu.  Yay for TIL.
> 
> Given the state of aptdaemon, I think it's in Ubuntu's interest to drop it,
> but that means porting or dropping language-selector-gnome, oem-config-gtk
> (src:ubuquity), and sessioninstaller.  I don't know what the states of those
> packages are, so the best I can do is file bugs against them.
> 
> Given where we are in the Zesty cycle, I recommend just dropping aptdaemon
> 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu17 from -proposed and marking LP: #1623856 as Won't Fix.
> Let's try to drop aptdaemon from Ubuntu in Acrobatic Aardvark.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Barry


-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20170315/4cffdeaa/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list