32 bit UEFI

Steve Langasek steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Thu Jan 9 00:38:31 UTC 2014


On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 07:19:41PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 07:04 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > which would certainly require independent QA in an Ubuntu context.
> > There would be the mini.iso from 
> > <http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/>,

> which is basically just a netboot image in ISO form; people could use that

> I thought that *was* our netinst?  What's the difference?

"netinst" is a specific, unintuitive name for a CD that Debian produces;
it's defined as an image that includes all the udebs from the archive
without including any .debs.  So this is debian-cd jargon, and should really
be avoided when talking about Ubuntu images, especially considering how
easily "netinst" can be confused with "netboot".

I think it's better to call what we produce a "minimal CD", as here:

  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/MinimalCD

But while this CD would continue to be available, and we probably wouldn't
spend effort on adding UEFI support to it, it's still not something that I
think we want to point to as a supported install method for broken-BIOS
machines, for the reasons mentioned in my previous mail.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20140108/b74bb959/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-devel mailing list