Follow Up from "Let's Discuss Interim Releases"

[Chow Loong Jin]

On 10/03/2013 09:35, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> [...]
> There's still the requirement to keep things in sync.  That's what I was
> referring to.  Also, for many common targets for SRUs/late bug fixes that are 
> actively maintained, the packages in the development release would quickly 
> diverge and so you'd still have to do two sets of patches.  Except for reduced 
> QA requirements, it doesn't seem to offer much over release and SRU and I'm not 
> sure reduced QA is actually a feature.

I don't really see an issue with having to maintain two sets of patches, really.
If we're going to have a rolling release as well as make stable releases,
maintaining two sets of patches for the SRUable changes is a minimum, and
something we should stick to.

-- 
Kind regards,
Loong Jin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130311/82db98e5/attachment.pgp>