Follow Up from "Let's Discuss Interim Releases"

[Phillip Susi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/09/2013 08:35 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> There's still the requirement to keep things in sync.  That's what
> I was referring to.  Also, for many common targets for SRUs/late
> bug fixes that are actively maintained, the packages in the
> development release would quickly diverge and so you'd still have
> to do two sets of patches.  Except for reduced QA requirements, it
> doesn't seem to offer much over release and SRU and I'm not sure
> reduced QA is actually a feature.

Yes, they would diverge, and you would have to upload two fixes, just
like what we do now with SRUs.  Where it differs from the current
release and SRU is that we have a longer period of feature freeze /
bug fix time before the final release, but without it holding up
ongoing development.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRO+ZXAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75PxwH/14Xk5ZlZq8grqDt3MAS2rqt
iGokrjjT5Kvag1TxMmcBEnqRnEBw4GlUNR+wTNnuxTrwGyUxkSH/Z4t40ztP35wY
qe1nIX5OZqHCt+wrWhs9K432RQfpb9cey4vezi8cB8fk0CEznSW0Tn4YaARXrW6A
YDcwWDSiHg9F2T11uUsoldcwJQRzf7yUzPZGyRVBgmVTc+KKmKuT+umb8v8SUpwJ
TYOVKw7AA2GwHX/xHettMY/mJrrJkJF2QuH2MZviJZGwha1W3oOpG9hWjOKFL06j
n2w5PmAE/xoerx9cKlYlohvc1/F1SKUui0Pvo4S5903DDSE6WG913+21zVW7sLc=
=ixzH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----