Follow Up from "Let's Discuss Interim Releases"
jono at ubuntu.com
Fri Mar 8 07:29:19 UTC 2013
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, March 07, 2013 08:01:37 PM Allison Randal wrote:
>> On 03/07/2013 07:15 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> > Maintaining the current cadence should also be one of the options.
>> That would be the default if no proposal was submitted to the TB or no
>> proposal approved by the TB.
>> Or, do you mean there's value in writing up the advantages of the
>> current cadence in parallel to the other options, for a clearer
>> comparison? I can see that.
> Yes. If options are going to be presented to the TB, stick with what we have
> should be one of them.
I presume that if there is no proposed change, there would be no
proposal to take to the TB, hence leaving off the current way of
working as an option. :-)
Ubuntu Community Manager
www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org
More information about the ubuntu-devel