Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)

[Ted Gould]

On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 19:03 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:

> On Feb 28, 2013, at 05:01 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
> >I hope that we will.  My biggest worry with the rolling release
> >methodology is that there is no deadlines for people to work towards
> >except the LTS deadlines.  This will then encourage more polishing and
> >refining, with a rush to an even bigger deadline.  We could all say "you
> >should be more disciplined than that," which is a truism, but one that
> >seems to ignore human nature.  So I hope that there will be deadlines
> >for the monthly releases that people can target, and use for their own
> >milestones.
> 
> +1 and I think the 3 month vUDSes will provide a nice cadence for that.


The problem there being that UDS is only signing up for more work, not a
point where the work has to be delivered :-)  Ubuntu has had, in the
past, an issue where the run up for UDS involves making sure we mark
everything as POSTPONED.

Ted

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130301/fd49d80c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130301/fd49d80c/attachment.pgp>