Xorg was removed.. without an alternative

[Aigars Mahinovs]

On 11 July 2013 08:43, Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:

> > It seems so strange to spend six months saying "don't touch that" just
> > to turn around and then spend nine months begging people to touch that...
>
> I know it can be confusing, but the $devel-proposed (that should be future
> proof) serves a completely different purpose than -proposed post-release.
>  Once
> Saucy is released, saucy-proposed will serve the same purpose -proposed has
> always served.  "Not for humans" only applies to the development phase.
>
>
It looks like the two different uses of -proposed should be separated, no?
So a $devel release would have an always empty $devel-proposed and all that
is currently pushed there would go to $devel-autobuilder-only-proposed or
something and a released verison would continue as-is.

-- 
Best regards,
    Aigars Mahinovs        mailto:aigarius at debian.org
  #--------------------------------------------------------------#
 | .''`.    Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)            |
 | : :' :   Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv)     |
 | `. `'    Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting   |
 |   `-                                 (http://www.aiteki.com) |
 #--------------------------------------------------------------#
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130711/3bbe554f/attachment.html>