Acoustic Models for HUD
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals
siegfried at gevatter.com
Tue Feb 26 14:38:22 UTC 2013
The publicity clause can be considered as a use restriction, and some
people also complained about the choice of venue. Those problems have been
raised upstream, but (last time I checked) didn't receive a response.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/07/msg00024.html
Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 schrieb Colin Watson :
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:46:34PM -0600, Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 19:13 +0100, Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals
> > wrote:
> > > The English Voxforge models are currently packaged in julius-voxforge.
> > > There I did go with the nightly builds there, since in addition to the
> > > time and disk size (which IMHO is already enough of a reason), it
> > > needed HTK to build, which is not redistributable. It'd also be
> > > interested in more opinions though.
> >
> > Yes, thanks for doing that! We found it early on and it created some
> > very good results. But yes, Julius does have redistribution problems.
> > But the library being 4-clause BSD and the tools.
>
> 4-clause BSD (i.e. with the advertising clause) isn't a distribution
> problem in itself; from a brief glance at the copyright file I couldn't
> work out why it was in multiverse. Does anyone have background on that?
>
> However, 4-clause BSD is incompatible with the GPL. We could grant an
> exception for Canonical-owned code, but we'd then have to make sure we
> never used any external GPL code. It probably wouldn't be worth the
> hassle.
>
> --
> Colin Watson [cjwatson at ubuntu.com]
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
--
Siegfried
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20130226/f4b81684/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-devel
mailing list