Dropping i386 non-PAE as a supported kernel flavour in Precise Pangolin
ben at decadent.org.uk
Fri Nov 11 03:03:31 UTC 2011
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:43 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Per discussion at UDS the kernel team is proposing to drop the non-PAE
> i386 flavour. The upgrade path for non-PAE users will be the PAE kernel.
> Those CPUs that do not have i686 and PAE support will be orphaned. To
> the best of my knowledge, these include Intel CPUs prior to Pentium II,
> 400Mhz Pentium M, VIA C3, and Geode LX. As far as I know, there are no
> laptop or desktop class CPUs being produced that do not meet these
> minimum requirements.
Assuming that '400Mhz Pentium M' means the 'Banias' models with a
400 MHz FSB, this agrees with my understanding of PAE support.
> Before I do something that is difficult to revert, I would like to hear
> from the development community why we should continue to maintain a
> kernel flavour that is (in my opinion) getting increasingly low
> utilization. It is my feeling that an extremely high percentage of users
> of the non-PAE kernel have a CPU that is PAE capable.
I agree. In Debian testing/unstable we replaced the '686' flavour with
'686-pae', with a check on installation to tell people if it won't work.
There's been very little complaint about this, though of course we do
maintain a non-PAE flavour.
> If there is sufficient community demand (and support), I would be
> willing to sponsor the first non-PAE kernel upload to Universe.
Coincidentally, none of those non-PAE processors support SMP (at least
not in the standard way Linux supports). So if you have a specifically
non-PAE flavour it's a useful optimisation to configure it as !SMP.
The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the ubuntu-devel